Summer Will Show (New York Review Books Classics)

Product Information

Our heroine is Sophia Willoughby, who begins Summer Will Show as a rich, aristocratic wife and mother in 1840s Dorset. Her marriage is not an especially companionable one, but she doesn’t seem particularly upset about it. Indeed, it seems to be par for the course. Warnerexpertly encapsulates the change in temperament between an engaged woman and a married woman of the period: However, there are two main issues which I have tried and failed to incorporate into what is good about the book. Warner's short stories include the collections A Moral Ending and Other Stories, The Salutation, More Joy in Heaven, The Cat's Cradle Book, A Garland of Straw, The Museum of Cheats. Winter in the Air, A Spirit Rises, A Stranger with a Bag, The Innocent and the Guilty, and One Thing Leading to Another. Her final work was a collection of interconnected short stories set in the supernatural Kingdoms of Elfin. [13] Many of these stories were published in The New Yorker. [16] In addition to fiction, Warner wrote anti-fascist articles for such leftist publications as Time and Tide and Left Review. [12]

Indeed, Minna’s personality is captured most effectively when we are told that‘she was always pitching herself to an imaginary gallery’. Her dramatic nature captures Sophia’s interest, and the burning resentment with which she arrives turns into affection, and then devotion…The excerpt I posted yesterday comes into play here.The prose is very readable, even though it occasionally doesn't flow as smoothly as prose of the later 20th Century. I should read more of this period to know if it is typical. Sophia - and a few others - looked upon the Jewish characters stereotypically. In all fairness. Warner presents the Jewish characters as people, not stereotypes. A curious, disappointing, puzzling book, and one which I found a great deal more interesting than enjoyable. It’s in the unusual position of being a novel which is basically modern but which feels doubly dated today: it was published in the 1930s, but while it’s ostensibly set in the French revolution of 1848, it still feels like the product of a twentieth-century literary conscience. It’s a book about the role of women in several different societies, all essentially patriarchal, and it’s also about the rise of socialism while being written in a time when another revolution in Britain was not inconceivable. The Journal of the Sylvia Townsend Warner Society. UCL Press; ISSN 2398-0605. Open access journal available free online. I didn’t hear or know of this writer before I started reading the novel, so I felt the need to read a little bit about her life. When she died, I was born. That caught my attention initially because I have started with the last paragraph of the Introduction. Then I jumped up and started with the first paragraph. She was born in the first decade of December, again a nice coincidence. In other words, I was satisfied enough to plunge my full zeal into the book. By the way, it took me 3 times reading of some text to understand that her lifelong partner was a woman. Well, I don’t have what to comment on this, but only to say personal tastes are not common :)) Warner was involved in travelling to study source material and in transcribing the music into modern musical notation for publication. Warner wrote a section on musical notation for the Oxford History of Music (it appeared in the introductory volume of 1929). [10]

Sophia seems rather unfeeling at the outset – strict, rather than motherly, and without any noticeably emotional attachments. Warner often summarises people’s essential characters through seemingly incidental – and here is Sophia’s sentence:‘She disliked sitting down in the middle of a walk, she disliked any kind of dawdling. A slow and rigid thinker, to sit still and contemplate was an anguish to her.’ I am always excited to find historical historical fiction - written in an earlier era, about an era earlier than that. I like discovering the way people in the past approached historical fiction, particularly when those people are very good writers. a b c d e Maroula Joannou, "Warner, Sylvia Townsend", in Faye Hammill, Esme Miskimmin, Ashlie Sponenberg (eds.) An Encyclopedia of British Women's Writing 1900-1950. Palgrave, 2008 ISBN 0-230-22177-7 (pp. 266-7) Summer is the story of a young Englishwoman, indignantly separated from her womanizing husband, whose kids die of smallpox. In the wake of all these disasters, which she finds refreshingly liberating, she journeys to Paris, falls in love with her estranged husband's Jewish mistress, and moves in with her. Along the way, she learns to eschew and shed the Oughts that her stuffy life thus far has been obligated to fulfill, and ends up on the barricades in '48. Sylvia Townsend Warner was a female writer with Communist sympathies in love with a female poet when she wrote this story of an upper-class Englishwoman, Sophia Willoughby, who falls in love with her husband's Jewish mistress Minna Lemuel in Paris and who becomes embroiled in the French revolution of 1848. It's much more the story of Sophia's changing politics and class loyalties than it is one of "lesbian love."However, less explainable is that Sophia's wealth comes from a sugar plantation in the Caribbean. From this, she has an uncle who has had a mixed race child with one of his enslaved women, Caspar, who comes to stay with her and eventually is killed dispassionately by Sophia in revenge for Minna's death in what is admittedly a rushed and confusing ending . Despite themes of equality etc. running through the novel Caspar has a flat and racist characterisation, and Sophia takes no responsibility for colonialism or the slave trade, with the usually wry novel having no comment either on the ethics of this. Caspar is a sour note, an object, unredeemable. This book is odd, fascinating and uneven. What's wonderful about it is practically sublime; that which is mediocre about it balloons and overtakes the plot and the narration by the conclusion. So what's wonderful about it, as far as I'm concerned, is the fact that this book was published in the same year as Gone with the Wind, yet it's practically the anti-Gone With the Wind. Her husband was boring too and even more unforgivably so was the 'captivating mistress' Minna. The Jewish storyteller who was a great artist and a passionate individual. Supposedly anyway. As it was Sophia who the narrators eye focused on we only got to see Minna through the filter of Sophia's thoughts which meant that she was totally washed out and anaemic. I couldn't even figure out if the two of them were lovers in the physical sense. Even Henry James gives a reader more to go on than this! I thought for much of this novel that the author had deftly overlaid this revolution of an individual with that of the French. (This is not the *big* revolution we all think of when we think French Revolution. This was *little* revolution. It had a similar result - Napoleon III.) I spent most of this novel remarking to myself that it is a very feminist novel. I came to revise my opinion somewhat, but that would be including even more spoilers here. I'll simply remark that I did not like the direction of the last approximately one quarter of the novel. And, as the description says "Then tragedy strikes: the children die." She has been raised a lady, a woman who is to occupy herself as wife and mother, doing needlework and writing letters. She recognizes she is no good at these tasks. Sophia despairs that she has no purpose in life. In 1847, an English woman did not travel alone, though she might have only her maid to accompany her. But Sophia, in a sort of revolution, takes herself to Paris - alone.