Seagate IronWolf, 4TB, NAS, Internal Hard Drive, CMR 3.5 Inch, SATA, 6GB/s, 5,900 RPM, 64MB Cache, for RAID Network Attached Storage, 3 year Rescue Services, FFP (ST4000VNZ08)

Product Information

IronWolf is designed for NAS enclosures with less wear and tear, little to no noise/vibration, no lag or downtime, improved file sharing performance, and more. Seagate doesn’t say how loud the Barracuda’s get but as they are desktop hard drives you would expect them to be louder than the IronWolf drives. VueVille Verdict Looking at the specs, the IronWolf has a much higher 27/7 operation workload of 180 TB/year vs the Barracuda’s 55 TB/year. So if your data requirements are within the Barracuda’s rating, you can use it instead of a NAS drive. We are getting the expected real life read and write speed from the IronWolf drive. The sequential read and write speeds are matching with the product specifications. For a 5,900 rpm drive, the transfer speed is quite fast.If you ever decide to install the IronWolf as your PC’s secondary storage, it should work relatively fine. However, do take note that BarraCuda drives are more suitable for PC environment because it is more optimised for everyday computing, lower price and faster read/write speed.

Step 6: MiniTool ShadowMaker is starting cloning the system disk to your hard drive. After cloning, you will get the following information window. The Pro drives also have a higher workload rating of 300TB/year, compared to 180TB/year for the Ironwolf. Overall, Seagate seems to be less reliable at lower capacities. IronWolf provides a three-year limited warranty, while IronWolf Pro a five-year limited warranty. IronWolf vs IronWolf Pro: Price Workload: It shows the NAS hard drive will have low failure rate if the drive reads and writes below a certain amount of data per year. Otherwise, the drive is most likely to fail. Although both IronWolf and IronWolf Pro drive deliver great performance, the IronWolf Pro offers some benefits for high-end users looking for a high level of reliability.The Seagate IronWolf drive is connected to the test rig as above through the motherboard’s SATA III 6Gbps connector. Tests conducted include synthetic benchmark via CrystalDiskMark and real world usage via the transfer of a 4 GB file between the PLEXTOR SSD and Seagate IronWolf HDD. Synthetic Benchmark Easily monitor drive health with the integrated IronWolf health management system and enjoy long-term reliability with an MTBF of 1 million hours.

For an advanced format disk or SSD, you can choose to align partitions to 1 MB to improve the performance. Load/Unload Cycles: It refers to the number of times the head moves in/out of the hard disk when powered on. This factor has nothing to do with the hard drive failure, but it will affect hard drive lifespan. Unrecoverable Read Errors: Its unit is usually bits and it refers to every time how many bits of data are read from the hard disk, there may be an error that cannot be corrected. It is one of the most important parameters for evaluating the stability of the hard disk.

User Comments :

Seagate comes out slightly on top since Western Digital doesn't offer any 7,200 RPM drives unless you pay more for the Red Pro series. Everything else is pretty much identical between the two storage families. This extra speed found in higher capacity drives from Seagate means increased access speeds, which is essential for storing and loading files on your server — looking for hard drives to install into your NAS? Go with the Seagate IronWolf.

Seagate 's IronWolf 4TB (ST4000VN008) is a hard drive that has been optimised by the manufacturer for use in network-attached storage, or NAS for short, with up to 8 drive bays. The model from the IronWolf series is not only aimed at private households but also specifically at creative professional groups, home office users and small companies who use a NAS and may want to use it from several workstations. The product is characterised above all by its high level of reliability and – unlike conventional hard drives – is suitable for 24-hour operation. Reliable and Consistent

Real World Usage

When selecting a NAS drive, the capacity is an important factor. Thus, this part is about IronWolf vs IronWolf Pro for capacity. Note: Some disk companies have recently begun to use AFR (Annualized Failure Rate) instead of MTBF, because AFR can indicate the reliability of a single product.