Kodak Portra 400 35m 36exp Film Professional 5 Pack

Product Information

All that said though, does it really matter? It’s a point worth mentioning because it’s a real phenomenon and I couldn’t write this review without bringing it up. It’s not something worth preaching about though. You can shoot what you want. Finally for this section, there’s a Portra 400 datasheet right here that gives you more information than I care to parrot, although I will relay some impressive-sounding highlights. Choose KODAK PROFESSIONAL PORTRA Films for natural skin tones, ideal colour, and finer grain in every situation. Day or night, studio or location, candid or posed, KODAK PROFESSIONAL PORTRA Films deliver:

Portra 400 ISO 120 Roll Film - Bristol Cameras Kodak Portra 400 ISO 120 Roll Film - Bristol Cameras

The ISO 400 rating gives you all the versatility you need in different light conditions too; especially with the exposure latitude meaning it’s hard to under or overexpose and the dynamic range meaning your shadows and highlights should both hold up in the same photograph too. For years, professional photographers have preferred KODAK PROFESSIONAL PORTRA Films because of their consistently smooth, natural reproduction of the full range of skin tones. In that same tradition, the new PORTRA 400 Film is the ideal choice for portrait and fashion photography, as well as for nature, travel and outdoor photography, where the action is fast or the lighting can?t be controlled. That said, Portra 400 handles almost anything you can throw at it. If you want to go shoot landscapes with Portra, it’s going to look great, and you can always persuade the color a touch in post (as I usually tend to do).As the old NC and VC versions were consolidated in 2010 due to the increase in digital processing going on, improving the scanning performance for the new version as Kodak did was a natural step forward too.

Portra 160 vs. 400 vs. 800: Here Are the Differences Kodak Portra 160 vs. 400 vs. 800: Here Are the Differences

Looking in the tree, there is a lot more shadow detail in the Portra 400 photo on the right than there can be found in the Lomo 400 photographs. Underexposure test If I wanted to give one of my point ‘n’ shoot cameras to a friend who doesn’t shoot film to try and see how they liked it, Portra would also be a likely choice. I think it’d give them results that’d make them want to shoot more film. But Lomo 400 is not so inflexible to not be worth purchasing. In fact, in many ways, the Lomo 400 looked better than the Portra 400 straight out of the camera.Kodak Portra is often the benchmark to aspire to for both film and digital cameras when it comes to natural skin tones. I have raved about it in the past and wrote a post on it. The less saturated Portra colours can really suit wedding photography hence it’s popularity (along with Fuji Pro 400H). When I shoot digital I only shoot in colour if I think colour adds to an image (or it is requested by a paying client such as a wedding). Again: just before sunrise, but a different angle: Portra 400 / Summicron 35mm ASPH Ektar / Summilux 50mm And Lomography is also one of the few companies that are actually innovating in the film photography space, so supporting them may just help the company to produce their own color film in the future. Strangely, these are some of my favorite conditions for this film. Most love shooting Portra where there is so much color to play with and that can certainly be exciting, but I feel it can handle these more dreary scenes much better than a film like Ektar can, and I love it for that.