Reebok Unisex's Nanoflex Tr Sneakers

Product Information

These shoes work fine for some types of CrossFit WODs. They’re definitely not ideal for all functional fitness workouts.

The Reebok Nano X’s Flexweave upper is awesome for abrasion resistance and the midsole and outsole both hold up fairly well to serious training as well. For the regular Reebok Nano X1, the durability is okay, but personally, I’d say go with the Nano X1 Grit or Adventure if upper durability is your concern.

The Nanoflex TRs come in a ton of colorways, just like the Reebok Nanos always have. For men, there are eight colorways available; for women, there are six colorways. I don’t expect Reebok to add any new designs to this lineup as the shoe isn’t marketed as a CrossFit shoe, rather as a budget-friendly cross-training shoe. These aren’t designed like true CrossFit shoes, so don’t be surprised when they don’t last as long as Nanos, NoBull Trainers, or Nike Metcons. The Reebok Nanoflex TRs are a solid pair of budget-friendly shoes. They’re a far cry from being on our roundup of the best CrossFit shoes and we wouldn’t recommend them for heavy lifters, but for recreational lifting, HIIT workouts, and everyday use, we think they’re a great shoe. The Reebok Nanoflex TR can work for runs, but I’d suggest capping your mileage to 1-2 miles as this model can get uncomfortable at times as mentioned above. Plus, the midsole while being more responsive than the Reebok Nano X isn’t my favorite for running. I’ve provided a few of the most common asks I receive about these shoes on YouTube videos and articles. If ever have a specific ask that isn’t answered in this article, always feel free to reach out. 1. How much do the Reebok Nano X1, Reebok Nano X, and Reebok Nanoflex TR weigh?

After a few workouts, Amanda says the upper gave and broke in, but you really have to be dedicated to getting through that break-in period. These would be a good option for people who generally find most cross-training shoes to be too wide. Wearing Reebok Nanoflex Training Shoes for CrossFit That’s why I love reviewing all kinds of workout shoes, from the Nike Free Metcon 4s to the Reebok Nano X1s to the NoBull Trainers. In this Reebok Nanoflex TR training shoes review, I divulge all the pros and cons of this Reebok Nano wannabe. Reebok Nanoflex TR: True-to-size, but the forefoot and boot construction can be a bit uncomfortable for some. Of these three models, the Nanoflex TR fits the most narrow especially through the midfoot and forefoot transition. These shoes just don’t provide the level of stability you need for heavy powerlifting and the Oly lifts. Amanda did, however, find them comfortable for what CrossFitters call accessory work: movements like split squats, Romanian deadlifts, and strict dumbbell presses. (Basically anything where the feet stay planted and you’re not going super heavy.) Wearing Reebok Nanoflex Training Shoes for Cardio The Reebok Nanoflex TR does not feature a removable insole. On top of this, it’s not even an insole that only has a little adhesive keeping it in place. The insole in this model is firmly built-in and I’d suggest not removing it to prevent any early breakdown in this model. For this reason, I don’t think the Nanoflex TR is good for anyone with custom insoles and orthotics. Reebok Nanoflex TR Vs Nano X1 Vs Nano X Durability

Photo Credits

As mentioned earlier in this article, the Reebok Nano X1 features Reebok’s signature Floatride Energy Foam throughout. This midsole construction has grown on me and I wasn’t actually the biggest fan of it in my first impressions, but after 6-months of training in them, I like the Floatride Energy Foam midsole. Upper Construction For stability testing, I’ve lifted over 500 lbs in this model, too, and it worked well, but there is definitely a lower threshold for compression compared to the Reebok Nano X. The upper in the traditional Reebok Nano X1 is also not the most durable for abrasion resistance in CrossFit workouts and I’d suggest looking into the Nano X1 Adventure or Grit for increased durability. The Reebok Nanoflex TRs don’t have any crazy innovative specs. They have a mesh upper, a rubber outsole with flex grooves, and EVA foam midsole and insoles. This is very basic construction for a pair of cross-training shoes. A shoe intended for intense workouts. Step up your flexibility with its rubber outsole with flex grooves. Lean into toughness and comfort with its athletic mesh and CMEVA midsole cushion. Reebok Nanoflex TR Training Shoe womens side Photo Credits Based on the lifting performance of each shoe, you could probably already guess which models excel for more versatile style training. Generally, when a shoe is more stable, then we’ll start to see versatility and responsiveness go down a bit. Of these three models, the Reebok Nano X1 takes the edge for HIIT, agility, and plyometric work.

The reason the Nanoflex TRs aren’t great for those movements is because the innersole is more springy than it is in true CrossFit shoes, and the heel-to-toe drop is larger. This creates an element of instability that, while not a dealbreaker for all people, is a serious annoyance to any CrossFitters accustomed to a more stable shoe. Wearing Reebok Nanoflex Training Shoes for Lifting Weights The Nanoflex TRs are similar to the Nanos in a lot of ways. For example, they both have rubber outsoles, mesh uppers, and feel relatively flat. The Nanoflex TRs also have a thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) heel cage and heel clip similar to that on the Nanos. The Nanoflex TR training shoes make phenomenal everyday shoes—as long as you have narrow feet. If you don’t, all of the good aspects of this shoe are for naught.Our fitness staff writer and personal trainer Amanda Capritto tested and reviewed the Nanoflex TRs, and her ultimate verdict was that these shoes aren’t the greatest for CrossFit or heavy lifting, but they’re a good buy for general fitness or everyday use.