Joined in 2023 
82 
63 About this deal
In some jurisdictions such as Singapore, judicial corporal punishment is part of the legal system. The officers who administer the punishment have immunity from prosecution for assault. Disclosing private sexual images without consent (so-called ‘revenge pornography’). This relates to private sexual photographs and films of a person that have been disclosed without the consent of an individual who appears in them, with intent to cause that individual distress. Such images may be uploaded onto the internet, often by a person’s ex-partner, to cause them distress, humiliation or embarrassment.
For offenders charged with assault, the Immigration Act 1971 may apply, section 3 (5) provides a person who is not a British Citizen is liable for deportation from the UK if the Home Secretary believes their removal to be conductive to the public good. This is a really good topic to discuss in a general essay question on consent and may be the subject of an essay question in its own right. Consider the acts allowed by the Court in Wilson which seem to bring the decision in Brown into disrepute somewhat. The act of branding is inherently violent and painful and done with the purpose of causing a scar, so it is difficult to see how this differentiates significantly from Brown. Especially consider the reference to “husband and wife” in the Wilson ruling and the fact that Brown involved a group of homosexuals, as it has been suggested that there may have been some prejudice by the courts in relation to this in considering what was in the public interest. In your opinion can the two rulings be reconciled? Do you feel that the Court in Brown was right to state that S&M is not in the public interest or should this be left to autonomous individuals to consent to as they please? Being intoxicated, not being asked, saying nothing, or saying yes to something else, is not consent. Being in a relationship or married to someone is not consent. Sexual assault is a crimeOffer practical support, such as asking them if they would like you to go with them to appointments. Meloy, J. Reid; Hoffmann, Jens (2021). International Handbook of Threat Assessment. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-094016-4. Assault with intent to resist arrest: under section 7(1)(b); this offence was formerly created by s.38 of the OAPA 1861. State Laws on Fetal Homicide and Penalty-enhancement for Crimes Against Pregnant Women". NCSL. National Conference of State Legislatures. 1 May 2018. It is possible to inflict GBH with one strike or punch, however the more sustained, ferocious or prolonged the incident, the more likely it is to be viewed that the consequences were intended.
The seemingly harsh ruling in Richardson will only extend as far as the fraud as to the qualifications has no bearing on the nature and quality of the act carried out. This is where the fraud leads the person to believe that the act is being carried out is one thing when it is in fact something entirely different. In New South Wales, the Crimes Act 1900 [38] defines a range of assault offences deemed more serious than common assault and which attract heavier penalties. These include: Criminal Violence In Sport", Modern Sports Law, Bloomsbury, pp.173–217, 2010, doi: 10.5040/9781509955640.ch-005, ISBN 978-1-8411-3685-1 , retrieved 23 March 2023 RvG ref 6. 1980): see "R v Brown (1993) 2 All ER 75". LawTeacher. Archived from the original on 16 October 2007 . Retrieved 17 September 2009. Assault and Battery Overview". criminal.findlaw.com. criminal.findlaw . Retrieved 18 September 2016.Applying Fagan v Metropolitan Police Commissioner [1969] 1 QB 439 and Haystead v DPP [2000] 3 All ER 690 it can be seen that the application of force can be indirect, therefore the push on the chair would suffice for the purposes of battery. The battery occurs when the chair causes Tim to fall forward and hit his head. This is the least serious assault. It is not at all uncommon for more serious assault charges to be reduced to common assault in "plea-bargaining" by prosecutors to avoid the additional expense of a Crown Court trial should the defendant elect for same. In real terms, the degree of fear or the level of injury required for a conviction can be unproven. No injury is required to prove battery. [ citation needed] See also [ edit ] Section 2 of the Non-Fatal Offences against the Person Act 1997 creates the offence of assault, and section 3 of that Act creates the offence of assault causing harm. Simple assault involves an intentional act that causes another person to be in reasonable fear of an imminent battery. Simple assault may also involve an attempt to cause harm to another person, where that attempt does not succeed. Simple assault is typically classified as a misdemeanor offense, unless the victim is a member of a protected class, such as being a law enforcement officer. [66] Even as a misdemeanor, an assault conviction may still result in incarceration and in a criminal record. causing stupor, unconsciousness or physical injury by intentionally administering a drug or controlled substance without consent [71]
It is a separate offence to assault on a constable in the execution of their duty, under Section 90, Police and Fire Reform (Scotland) Act 2012 (previously Section 41 of the Police (Scotland) Act 1967) which provides that it is an offence for a person to, amongst other things, assault a constable in the execution of their duty or a person assisting a constable in the execution of their duty. Baker, Dennis; William, Glanville. "Chapter 9". Textbook of Criminal Law. London, Sweet & Maxwell. [ full citation needed] In English law, s.58 Children Act 2004 limits the availability of the lawful correction defense to common assault. [33] This defence was abolished in Wales in 2022. [34] Assault in Ancient Greece was normally termed hubris. Contrary to modern usage, the term did not have the extended connotation of overweening pride, self-confidence or arrogance, often resulting in fatal retribution. In Ancient Greece, "hubris" referred to actions which, intentionally or not, shamed and humiliated the victim, and frequently the perpetrator as well. It was most evident in the public and private actions of the powerful and rich. the rape and sexual abuse support line run by Rape Crisis England and Wales – you can call the helpline on 0808 500 2222 or use the online chat (both are free and are open 24 hours a day, every day of the year)Grievous bodily harm [47] – which includes the destruction of a foetus, permanent or serious disfiguring, and transmission of a grievous bodily disease [48] Sec. 53a-60. Assault in the second degree: Class D felony.:: Chapter 952 — Penal Code: Offenses (contains Secs. 53a-24 to 53a-323):: Title 53a — Penal Code (contains Chapters 950 to 952):: 2005 Connecticut Code:: Connecticut Code: US Codes and Statutes: US Law: Justia". Justia Law . Retrieved 10 May 2015. Although the range and precise application of defenses varies between jurisdictions, the following represents a list of the defenses that may apply to all levels of assault: Actual bodily harm is defined in R v Donovan [1934] 2 KB 498 as an injury that is more than transient or trifling. R v Miller [1954] 2 All ER 529 clarified this further stating it to be any hurt or injury calculated to interfere with the health and comfort of the victim. However, R v Chan Fook [1994] 1 WLR 689 qualified this somewhat stating that the inclusion of the word ‘actual’ indicates that the injury whilst not needing to be permanent, cannot be so trivial so as to be wholly insignificant. For example, a concussion will not usually cause permanent damage but it is clearly more than insignificant harm. Conversely a sore arm would be neither permanent or significant. The actus reus is established through the causing of the apprehension of force and there does not need to be any application of actual force on the victim.
Listen to the person, but don't ask for details of the assault. Don't ask them why they didn't stop it. This can make them feel as though you blame them. Atoki, Morayo (1995). "Assault and S 47 of the Offences against the Person Act 1861". The Journal of Criminal Law. 59 (3): 301. doi: 10.1177/002201839505900307. S2CID 148828619.Along with other factors such as the level of injury, the court will consider a number of options and determine whether rehabilitative, non-custodial alternatives are suitable, compared to an immediate custodial term. That Act formerly created the offence of 'Assault on a constable in the execution of his duty'. under section 7(1)(a), but that section has been superseded by section 66(1) of the Police (Northern Ireland) Act 1998 (c.32) which now provides that it is an offence for a person to, amongst other things, assault a constable in the execution of his duty, or a person assisting a constable in the execution of his duty.
Great Deal 
New Comment